Home Information Packs - are They Worth the Paper They are Written On?

Home Information Packs were first mentioned asprovision requiring a copy of a lease to be included
part of the Labour party manifesto back in 1997in the packs.
and were originally deemed to be the solution toConservative Shadow  Housing Minister Grant
the then common problem of gazumping. In theShapps, said: "Home Information Packs have
eight years that have followed, the reason foralready strangled the housing market by
existence of HIPS is that they can speed up anddiscouraging sellers. Given its fragile state, the
simplify the current housebuying process. HIPsproperty market needs more bureaucratic red
were finally introduced last August in a bid totape like a hole in the head.  "Behind the
simplify the home-buying process, but havesmokescreen of HIPs, Labour's real agenda is to
received some very negative press since.build up a property database of every home.
One of the main aims of the HIP legislation is toProperty Information Questionnaires are most
reduce the current high percentage of agreedlikely just another way of conducting Labour’s
sales (reportedly more than one in four) that docontroversial council tax revaluation and re-banding
not make it as far as an exchange of contracts. by the backdoor.  "The public will be clobbered 
HIPS were intended to deliver this aspiration bytwice - once for a costly Home Information Pack
providing key information at the beginning of theand then again in the form of higher council tax
house buying process.bills for home improvements and their parking
Recent survey has revealed that the majority ofspaces."
house buyers think Home Information Packs are aThere is evidence that the controversial Home
waste of time, with fifty-seven per cent of thoseInformation Pack (HIP) scheme has failed to
questioned saying it is time to scrap HIPs andspeed up the house selling process, new figures
many blaming the cost of providing them as asuggest.
contributing factor to the significant decline in theThe packs, introduced a year ago despite huge
number properties being offered for sale in theopposition, are failing to be compiled in under a
UK.week – as the Government hoped would be
A YouGov poll found that only 5 per cent believedpossible – because local authorities are far
the packs had delivered benefits, while 68 perslower at retrieving local searches than a year
cent said they had failed to make a positiveago.   Searches are one of the key documents
difference.  The results of the survey arecontained within a pack. They flag up any potential
another blow to the controversial packs, whichroad schemes or developments that might scare
cost sellers anything from £200 - £400 andoff a home buyer from moving to the area.
contain title deeds, searches and an energy 
performance certificate.The average time taken by councils to hand over
The scheme was opposed by estate agent tradesearches has increased by a third, from 5.3 days
bodies, solicitors and the Council of Mortgageto 7 days.  Some councils are taking more than
Lenders.   Critics of HIPS say that some buyers20 days to process a request, with the London
have been forced to seek independent adviceBorough of Hillingdon taking 44 days on average.
after finding the content of the packs unreliable.Local councils increasingly poor performance in
A Conservative party housing spokesman Grantregard to providing search data is impacting
Shapps said HIPs had undermined the housingnegatively on HIPs in two ways.   Firstly, virtually
market.  “One year on, the public don't trustall HIP providers now subcontract their searches
the paper these packs are written on”, heto personal search companies to get the search
said.   Mr Shapps went on to say that “thecomponent for the HIP completed as soon as
only people who want to keep these broken HIPspossible.  This means that the search information
are the vested interests who are peddling them,contained in the HIP will usually not contain most
and the Government ministers who are falselyof the relevant information as would be revealed
using the green fig leaf of the environment toby an official Council search.  Secondly, with
justify this latest public policy disaster.”more and more councils levying higher level of
A Spokesperson from the National Association ofcharges for official searches and length of time
Estate Agents, said: 'Since their conception, thetaken to deliver, there is a direct impact on HIP
packs have been surrounded by a catalogue ofproviders and, consequently, on the price paid by
disasters.  'And, so far, rather than helping tothe consumer.
improve the home buying and selling process, 
they have served as a hindrance and nothingSir Bryan Carsberg earlier this month, after
more than a purposeless piece of red tape.'spending a year investigating the housing market,
 recommended that HIPs should be scrapped,
Confusion over the implementation of the packsarguing that, "they don't make a useful
forced former Communities Secretary Ruth Kellycontribution to the house buying process. They
to delay their implementation and exclude smallerdon't speed up transactions and they are in
homes from the initial phase of the scheme lastdanger of becoming out of date too quickly.  "It
year.seems to me to impose a cost, without bringing
The troubled introduction of the HIPS schemeany benefit."
does not appear to have dampened the 
Government’s appetite for HIPS, as theyShadow Housing Minister, Grant Shapps, said the
have recently announced plans to increase theslowness of the Local Authorities was proof that
amount of information required to go into HomeHIPs were not working.  "This shatters one of
Information Packs.  This move will likely increaseLabour's last remaining arguments about the
the cost of producing each HIP.benefits of Hips and adds to the mounting dossier
Government now wants to include a Propertyof evidence against them.  "The industry doesn't
Information Questionnaire (PIQ) in the packs towant them and neither do the buyers and sellers
give people more information about a property up- they are strangling the market at a time when it
front.  It hopes the move will reduce theneeds kickstarting," he said.
likelihood of issues coming to light further on in the 
process and causing delays or sales to fallConversely, a spokesman for the Department of
through.  The questionnaires would includeCommunities and Local Government said: "As a
information on any building work that has beenresult of the increased transparency brought
carried out on the property, details on parkingabout by HIPs, we are already seeing a drop in
arrangements, council tax banding and informationcost for sellers commissioning searches –
on the utilities connected to the property.  Themore than 160 local authorities have cut their
Government aim to implement this extraprices by an average of £20.  "We have issued
requirement as a mandatory part of the packs onguidance to councils to ensure they are giving
January 1, 2009.access to private search companies, to increase
Housing Minister Caroline Flint said: "Having the rightcompetition and provide the consumer with
information about a property at the beginning ofcheaper and faster searches."
the home-buying process is essential if we are to 
reduce delays and cut down on wasted costs forHowever, as charges for official searches are
both buyers and sellers.  "Hips are an importantbetween two to three times more expensive
first step in achieving greater efficiency and thethan the personal search option, it is doubtful
Property Information Questionnaire will onlywhether any HIP provider will utilise the option of
improve on this, ensuring the buying and sellingthe more expensive official search in a highly
process is simpler for all."competetive HIPs market.
The Government is also considering increasing the 
quality of leasehold information that is included inBuyers of property may well find that the search
the packs.  New information on leaseholds wouldinformation included within the HIP for the
include details on ground rent, services charges,property they are buying is out of date or too
the cost of buildings insurance and any majorvague to pass the scrutiny of the lender.  This
works that are planned, as well as a copy of thesituation will of course delay the selling process
lease itself.  There is currently only a temporaryand defeat the object of HIPS.