Should the Government Compensate the Clients of TAT?

This, of course, is a political decision. There is nocredit crunch ensued and business bankruptcies
"right" thing to do. Even the IMF imperatives areproliferated. Venezuela entered one of the worst
not sacred. Sometimes, inflationary goals shouldeconomic periods in its history with rampant
be sacrifice to avoid the total collapse of theunemployment and a virtual state of economic
banking system and, with it, the economy as adepression. It cost the country 12 billion USD to
whole.Unfortunately, a lot of experience has beenextract its banking system from the throes of
accumulated elsewhere in the world. No countryimminent evaporation - an amount equal to 22%
was exempt, all suffered collapsing orof its annual GDP.And this was nothing compared
near-collapsing banking systems. India had toto the Brazilian predicament. Brazil is divided to
nationalize the fourteen biggest banks - and, latergeographically huge states, each with its own
on, tens of private, smaller ones - in 1969.Thisdevelopment bank. These banks are really
was done to avert a major financial catastrophe.commercial banks. They have hundreds of
No one can enumerate all the banking crises inbranches spread across the states, they take
England. As late as 1991 it had a 10 billion USDdeposits and make loans to business firms and to
collapse (the BCCI bank).In 1973-4, during theindividuals. But their main debtors are the
"secondary banking crisis", the government had toadministrations of the states. When Banespa, the
launch operation "Lifeboat" to save 60 banks.Sao Paolo state development bank collapsed, it
They failed because the Bank of Englandwas owed 19 billion USD by the state
deregulated the credit markets and freed it togovernment, not to mention other bad loans. This
competition.As we review this scorched earth ofbank had 1,500 branches and millions of
ruined banks, six patterns emerge concerning thedepositors. It would have been political suicide to
compensation offered by the state to thejust let it die away. In December 1994, the
adversely affected clients.The USA established aCentral Bank took over the day to day
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) asmanagement of the bank and installed its own
early as 1933.Every depositor in every Americanpeople in it. The bank was later completely
bank is insured and the participation of the banksnationalized. Moreover, the other state
in the FDIC is obligatory. The FDIC coversdevelopment banks began to wobble, together
deposits of up to 100,000 USD per person perwith a sizeable chunk of the private banking
bank.The savings and loans associations (SLAs)sector - 27 banks in total. This was really ominous
were insured in a separate agency, theand the government came up with a creative
FSLIC.When a wave of bankruptcies engulfed thesolution: instead of saving the banks - it saved the
SLAs in 1985-7, the FSLIC went bust and wasbig clients of the banks. Sao Paolo received 66
unable to meet the demands of the panickybillion USD in federal credits which assisted it in
depositors.The USA reorganized the wholere-financing and in re-scheduling its debts,
system but it also decided to compensate theespecially its debts towards Banespa. The bank
depositors and savers in the SLAs. To do that, itwas saved, the state was saved, the federal
initially injected - using budget contingency funds -budget was 66 billions poorer - and this was only
10.8 billion USD. Then, a special agency was set upthe beginning. In certain cases, the loan (asset)
(the RTC). This agency established RefCorp, aportfolios were so bad and unrecoverable that the
corporation whose sole purpose was to issuegovernment had to inject money to the bank
bonds to the public and sell them in the variousitself - because there were no more clients to
stock exchanges throughout the USA. Theinject money to. Banco do Brazil received 7.8
proceeds of the of the sale were used to beefbillion USD on condition that it writes off loans
up the failing SLAs and to make their balancefrom its books. Another 13.6 billion USD were
sheets much healthier.It is important to note thatgiven to private banks. The government also
nothing explicit was promised to the depositors.cajoled banks into merging or into finding foreign
The government made vague and latepartners. The depositors were completely
statements about its willingness to support thecompensated but only a few of the 27 saved
ailing institutions. This was enough to calm thebanks are of any interest to foreign investors.
panic and to re-establish trust between theAfter all, a bank without assets is hardly a bank
depositors and the SLAs.RefCorp bonds were notat all.The most vicious of all banking affairs in this
backed by a federal guarantee. Still, the fact thatpart of the world occurred in Paraguay a year
RefCorp was a federal entity, associated with thelater. The Treasure of the Central Bank, no less,
administration was enough to give it a federalwas found using the Central Bank funds to run a
credit rating.People believed in the sincerity of thelucrative money lending operation. He lent 3 million
commitment of the government and in the longof the bank's funds before he was caught.
term repayment prospects of the bonds. TheyNeedless to sat that he pocketed the interest
bought 300 billion worth and the money waspayments. In April 1995, the Governor of the
immediately injected to heal the bankruptCentral Bank there decided that things were
institutions. Using long term debt - which was notgetting too hot for him and he fled the country
even part of its obligations - the government wasaltogether. The public was in panic. No one knew
able to stabilize the financial system and to fullywhat happened to the reserves of the
compensate depositors for their money.A similarcommercial banks which were deposited with the
approach was adopted by Israel to cope with itsCentral Banks. Banks with no reserves are very
1983 banking crisis. The whole banking systemshaky and dangerous institutions. So, depositors
collapsed as a result of a failure of a pyramidand savers queued in front of the banks to draw
scheme involving the banks' shares. Thetheir money. It was a matter of a very short
government was faced with civil unrest andtime before the banks became insolvent and
decided to compensate those who bought theclosed down their operations, albeit "temporarily".
shares in the stock exchange.At first, the banksFour banks and 16 savings houses collapsed that
were nationalized and trading in their shares in theyear and four more banks - the next. The bank
stock exchange was suspended to prevent panicsupervision discovered mountains and oceans of
selling. The government, having become theblack money on which the banks paid high rates
owner of the banks, declared a share buybackof interest. The legal "white" money - a much
scheme. Owners of bank shares were permittedsmaller amount altogether - bore a lower rate of
to sell them to the government in three specificinterest.The government adopted a politically
dates over a period of 9 years (originally, thebrave decision: it would compensate only those
share buyback scheme was for a period of 6depositors which deposited money on which they
years with two exit dates but it was prolonged).paid taxes ("legal money"). Even so, the damage
The price at which the government agreed towas great (in Paraguayan terms): 450 million USD.
buy the shares back from the public was theThose depositors who received excess interest
price on the last day that the shares were tradedpayments on their undeclared funds - lost both
prior to the collapse (5/10/83) and it was linked totheir funds and the interest accruing thereon.
the exchange rate of the Shekel-USD. TheMoreover, the government forced the owners of
government used funds allocated within thethe banks to increase the equity capital. The
national budget to buy the shares back. Thissystem was saved, though the basic malaise was
means that it used taxpayers money to financiallynot cured and the banking system is still obscure,
save a select group of shareholders. But theresecretive, nepotistic and highly dangerous.A course
was no public outcry: so many people werevery similar to that chosen by Macedonia was
involved in these pyramid schemes for so longadopted by the government of Japan.In 1990, the
that all the citizens stood to benefit from thisTokyo Stock Exchange began its long 50%
generous handout. When the last shares weredecline. People lost trillions of USD.As a result, they
bought in 1992 the total damage became evident:had no money to continue to pay the outlandish
no less than 6 billion USD (minus what theprices which were demanded by sellers of real
government could get when it were to sell theestate property. So, real estate prices went down
banks that it owned).1994 was arguably theby as much as 80% in the Tokyo area - and by
worst year for banks in South America sincea bit less elsewhere in Japan. Real estate property
1982. Banks collapsed all over that region.Itserved as the main security on huge portfolios of
started with Venezuela in January 1994. One ofloans which were provided by banks through
the major banks there, Banco Latino, failed,Junsen, financing corporations set up especially to
dragging with it 7 others. The Governmentprovide mortgage collateralised loans.The logical -
decided to fully compensate all the depositors andand inevitable - result was the collapse of seven
savers in these banks. It has created a specialimportant Junsen, followed by a chain reaction of
fund to which revenues from the sale of oil werebanks ceasing to function.The Japanese
transferred. Obviously, this money was takengovernment set up a special agency, the HLAC,
away from the budget and was compensated forwhich "cleaned" the books of the banks by taking
by extra taxation. The whole economy wasover the non-performing loans.
horribly effected: inflation shot up uncontrollably, a