Everything about real estate business


The Revolt of the Poor: The Demise of Intellectual Property?

Three years ago I published a book of shortprice sensitive and highly elastic. Lower
stories in Israel. The publishing houseprices will be more than compensated for by a
belongs to Israel's leading (and exceedinglymuch higher sales volume. There is no other
wealthy) newspaper. I signed a contract whichway to explain the pirate industries :
stated that I am entitled to receive 8% ofevidently, at the right price a lot of people
the income from the sales of the book afterare willing to buy these products. High
commissions payable to distributors, shops,prices are an implicit trade-off favouring
etc. A few months later (1997), I won thesmall, elite, select, rich world clientele.
coveted Prize of the Ministry of EducationThis raises a moral issue : are the children
(for short prose). The prize money (a fewof Macedonia less worthy of education and
thousand DMs) was snatched by the publishingaccess to the latest in human knowledge and
house on the legal grounds that all the moneycreation ?Two developments threaten the
generated by the book belongs to them becausefuture of intellectual property rights. One
they own the copyright.In the mythologyis the Internet. Academics, fed up with the
generated by capitalism to pacify the masses,monopolistic practices of professional
the myth of intellectual property stands out.publications - already publish on the web in
It goes like this : if the rights tobig numbers. I published a few book on the
intellectual property were not defined andInternet and they can be freely downloaded by
enforced, commercial entrepreneurs would notanyone who has a computer or a modem. The
have taken on the risks associated withfull text of electronic magazines, trade
publishing books, recording records, andjournals, billboards, professional
preparing multimedia products. As a result,publications, and thousands of books is
creative people will have suffered becauseavailable online. Hackers even made sites
they will have found no way to make theiravailable from which it is possible to
works accessible to the public. Ultimately,download whole software and multimedia
it is the public which pays the price ofproducts. It is very easy and cheap to
piracy, goes the refrain.But this ispublish on the Internet, the barriers to
factually untrue. In the USA there is a veryentry are virtually nil. Web pages are hosted
limited group of authors who actually live byfree of charge, and authoring and publishing
their pen. Only select musicians eke out asoftware tools are incorporated in most word
living from their noisy vocation (most ofprocessors and browser applications. As the
them rock stars who own their labels - GeorgeInternet acquires more impressive sound and
Michael had to fight Sony to do just that)video capabilities it will proceed to
and very few actors come close to derivingthreaten the monopoly of the record
subsistence level income from theircompanies, the movie studios and so on.The
profession. All these can no longer besecond development is also technological. The
thought of as mostly creative people. Forcedoft-vindicated Moore's law predicts the
to defend their intellectual property rightsdoubling of computer memory capacity every 18
and the interests of Big Money, Madonna,months. But memory is only one aspect of
Michael Jackson, Schwarzenegger and Grishamcomputing power. Another is the rapid
are businessmen at least as much as they aresimultaneous advance on all technological
artists.Economically and rationally, wefronts. Miniaturization and concurrent
should expect that the costlier a work of artempowerment by software tools have made it
is to produce and the narrower its market -possible for individuals to emulate much
the more emphasized its intellectual propertylarger scale organizations successfully. A
rights.Consider a publishing house.A booksingle person, sitting at home with 5000 USD
which costs 50,000 DM to produce with aworth of equipment can fully compete with the
potential audience of 1000 purchasersbest products of the best printing houses
(certain academic texts are like this) -anywhere. CD-ROMs can be written on, stamped
would have to be priced at a a minimum of 100and copied in house. A complete music studio
DM to recoup only the direct costs. Ifwith the latest in digital technology has
illegally copied (thereby shrinking thebeen condensed to the dimensions of a single
potential market as some people will preferchip. This will lead to personal publishing,
to buy the cheaper illegal copies) - itspersonal music recording, and the to the
price would have to go up prohibitively todigitization of plastic art. But this is only
recoup costs, thus driving out potentialone side of the story.The relative advantage
buyers. The story is different if a bookof the intellectual property corporation does
costs 10,000 DM to produce and is priced atnot consist exclusively in its technological
20 DM a copy with a potential readership ofprowess. Rather it lies in its vast pool of
1,000,000 readers. Piracy (illegal copying)capital, its marketing clout, market
should in this case be more readily toleratedpositioning, sales organization, and
as a marginal phenomenon.This is the theory.distribution network.Nowadays, anyone can
But the facts are tellingly different. Theprint a visually impressive book, using the
less the cost of production (brought down byabove-mentioned cheap equipment. But in an
digital technologies) - the fiercer theage of information glut, it is the marketing,
battle against piracy. The bigger the marketthe media campaign, the distribution, and the
- the more pressure is applied to clamp downsales that determine the economic
on samizdat entrepreneurs.Governments, fromoutcome.This advantage, however, is also
China to Macedonia, are introducingbeing eroded.First, there is a psychological
intellectual property laws (under pressureshift, a reaction to the commercialization of
from rich world countries) and enforcing themintellect and spirit. Creative people are
belatedly. But where one factory is closed onrepelled by what they regard as an oligarchic
shore (as has been the case in mainlandestablishment of institutionalized, lowest
China) - two sprout off shore (as is the casecommon denominator art and they are fighting
in Hong Kong and in Bulgaria).But this defiesback.Secondly, the Internet is a huge (200
logic : the market today is global, the costsmillion people), truly cosmopolitan market,
of production are lower (with the exceptionwith its own marketing channels freely
of the music and film industries), theavailable to all. Even by default, with a
marketing channels more numerous (half of theminimum investment, the likelihood of being
income of movie studios emanates from videoseen by surprisingly large numbers of
cassette sales), the speedy recouping of theconsumers is high.I published one book the
investment virtually guaranteed. Moreover,traditional way - and another on the
piracy thrives in very poor markets in whichInternet. In 50 months, I have received 6500
the population would anyhow not have paid thewritten responses regarding my electronic
legal price. The illegal product is inferiorbook. Well over 500,000 people read it (my
to the legal copy (it comes with noLink Exchange meter registered c. 2,000,000
literature, warranties or support). So whyimpressions since November 1998). It is a
should the big manufacturers, publishingtextbook (in psychopathology) - and 500,000
houses, record companies, software companiesreaders is a lot for this kind of
and fashion houses worry?The answer lurks inpublication. I am so satisfied that I am not
history. Intellectual property is asure that I will ever consider a traditional
relatively new notion. In the near past, nopublisher again. Indeed, my last book was
one considered knowledge or the fruits ofpublished in the very same way.The demise of
creativity (art, design) as 'patentable', orintellectual property has lately become
as someone's 'property'. The artist was but aabundantly clear. The old intellectual
mere channel through which divine graceproperty industries are fighting tooth and
flowed. Texts, discoveries, inventions, worksnail to preserve their monopolies (patents,
of art and music, designs - all belonged totrademarks, copyright) and their cost
the community and could be replicated freely.advantages in manufacturing and marketing.But
True, the chosen ones, the conduits, werethey are faced with three inexorable
honoured but were rarely financiallyprocesses which are likely to render their
rewarded. They were commissioned to produceefforts vain:The Newspaper PackagingPrint
their works of art and were salaried, in mostnewspapers offer package deals of cheap
cases. Only with the advent of the Industrialcontent subsidized by advertising. In other
Revolution were the embryonic precursors ofwords, the advertisers pay for content
intellectual property introduced but theyformation and generation and the reader has
were still limited to industrial designs andno choice but be exposed to commercial
processes, mainly as embedded in machinery.messages as he or she studies the
The patent was born. The more massive thecontent.This model - adopted earlier by radio
market, the more sophisticated the sales andand television - rules the internet now and
marketing techniques, the bigger thewill rule the wireless internet in the
financial stakes - the larger loomed thefuture. Content will be made available free
issue of intellectual property. It spreadof all pecuniary charges. The consumer will
from machinery to designs, processes, books,pay by providing his personal data
newspapers, any printed matter, works of art(demographic data, consumption patterns and
and music, films (which, at their beginningpreferences and so on) and by being exposed
were not considered art), software, softwareto advertising. Subscription based models are
embedded in hardware, processes, businessbound to fail.Thus, content creators will
methods, and even unto geneticbenefit only by sharing in the advertising
material.Intellectual property rights -cake. They will find it increasingly
despite their noble title - are less aboutdifficult to implement the old models of
the intellect and more about property. Thisroyalties paid for access or of ownership of
is Big Money : the markets in intellectualintellectual property.DisintermediationA lot
property outweigh the total industrialof ink has been spilt regarding this
production in the world. The aim is to secureimportant trend. The removal of layers of
a monopoly on a specific work. This is anbrokering and intermediation - mainly on the
especially grave matter in academicmanufacturing and marketing levels - is a
publishing where small- circulation magazineshistoric development (though the continuation
do not allow their content to be quoted orof a long term trend).Consider music for
published even for non-commercial purposes.instance. Streaming audio on the internet or
The monopolists of knowledge and intellectualdownloadable MP3 files will render the CD
products cannot allow competition anywhere inobsolete. The internet also provides a venue
the world - because theirs is a world market.for the marketing of niche products and
A pirate in Skopje is in direct competitionreduces the barriers to entry previously
with Bill Gates. When he sells a piratedimposed by the need to engage in costly
Microsoft product - he is depriving Microsoftmarketing ("branding") campaigns and
not only of its income, but of a clientmanufacturing activities.This trend is also
(=future income), of its monopolistic statuslikely to restore the balance between artist
(cheap copies can be smuggled into otherand the commercial exploiters of his product.
markets), and of its competition-deterringThe very definition of "artist" will expand
image (a major monopoly preserving asset).to include all creative people. One will seek
This is a threat which Microsoft cannotto distinguish oneself, to "brand" oneself
tolerate. Hence its efforts to eradicateand to auction off one's services, ideas,
piracy - successful in China and an utterproducts, designs, experience, etc. This is a
failure in legally-relaxed Russia.But whatreturn to pre-industrial times when artisans
Microsoft fails to understand is that theruled the economic scene. Work stability will
problem lies with its pricing policy - notvanish and work mobility will increase in a
with the pirates. When faced with a globallandscape of shifting allegiances, head
marketplace, a company can adopt one of twohunting, remote collaboration and similar
policies: either to adjust the price of itslabour market trends.Market FragmentationIn a
products to a world average of purchasingfragmented market with a myriad of mutually
power - or to use discretionary differentialexclusive market niches, consumer preferences
pricing (as pharmaceutical companies wereand marketing and sales channels - economies
forced to do in Brazil and South Africa). Aof scale in manufacturing and distribution
Macedonian with an average monthly income ofare meaningless. Narrowcasting replaces
160 USD clearly cannot afford to buy thebroadcasting, mass customization replaces
Encyclopaedia Encarta Deluxe. In America, 50mass production, a network of shifting
USD is the income generated in 4 hours of anaffiliations replaces the rigid owned-branch
average job. In Macedonian terms, therefore,system. The decentralized,
the Encarta is 20 times more expensive.intrapreneurship-based corporation is a late
Either the price should be lowered in theresponse to these trends. The
Macedonian market - or an average world pricemega-corporation of the future is more likely
should be fixed which will reflect an averageto act as a collective of start-ups than as a
global purchasing power.Something must behomogeneous, uniform (and, to conspiracy
done about it not only from the economictheorists, sinister) juggernaut it once was.
point of view. Intellectual products are very



1 A B C D 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105