Appraisal - Subsidized Housing

The purpose of this article is to analyze valuationpay contract rent of $0.70 to $0.80 per square
methodology for several atypical types offoot per month for subsidized housing projects,
apartments. Various circumstances and situationseven though the market rent for competing
can cause an apartment complex to haveprojects might only be $0.45 to $ 0.50 per square
above-or below-market rental rates, occupancyfoot per month. The rent and sales comparables
rates and operating expenses. This analysisused in this analysis are located in a neighborhood
examines the following two situations:characterized by income levels in the bottom
low-income subsidized apartments, which receivequartile of the Houston area, minimal new
above-market rental rates from HUD or anotherconstruction of residential or commercial buildings
government agency, andfor 25 years and heterogeneous levels of quality
projects that are part of the Low Incomeand appeal. Some sections, such as Riverside,
Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program.The LIHTChave experienced gentrification, but other areas
program was established by the U.S. Congress toare marked by poorly maintained properties. Both
encourage development of affordable housing inthe market rent projects and the subsidized rent
economically disadvantaged areas. Projectprojects are located in the area south of
developers receive a tax credit for following thedowntown Houston, bound by 288 to the west,
guidelines established by the program. TheyInterstate-45 to the east, and Almeda-Genoa to
typically sell these credits to Fortune 500the south. Consider the following tables which list
corporations for 45 percent to 60 percent of therental rates for projects which do not participate
total project cost, excluding land.The first step inin a subsidy program (market rent projects) and
the valuation process is analyzing market valueprojects which do participate in a subsidized rent
definitions. The following is the definition from theprogram:Sources at the Houston HUD office
Texas Property Tax Code, Section 1.04 (7):indicate that expiring contracts for subsidized
market value means the price at which aproperties are being reviewed - if the owner so
property would transfer for cash or its equivalentdesires - for only one year. After that term, it is
under prevailing market conditions if: exposed foruncertain which course the plan will take.
sale in the open market with a reasonable timeIndications that are subsidized programs are
for the seller to find a purchaser, both the sellerchanging from the current contract rent method
and the purchaser know of all the uses andto a resident voucher program. The voucher
purposes to which the property is adapted andmethod would involve issuing certificates to
for which it is capable of being used and of theindividuals who may then use the voucher at any
enforceable restrictions to its use, and both theparticipating property. The voucher amount would
seller and the purchaser seek to maximize theirbe based on individual's income. In addition to the
gains and neither is in a position to takeplan to phase out above-market subsidized rents,
advantage of the exigencies of the other.Sectionanother reason not to use contract rent when
(b) of the Texas Property Tax Code furthervaluing subsidized housing is it is inconsistent with
requires: the market value of property shall benational public policy to penalize apartment
determined by the application of generallyoperators participating in this program since the
accepted appraisal techniques, and the same ordifference between market rent and contract
similar appraisal techniques shall be used inrent is compensation for participating in the
appraising the same or similar kinds of property.program and working with the low-income
However, each property shall be appraised basedresidents. It would also be inconsistent with
upon the individual characteristics that affect thepractice in Texas to use contract rent instead of
property's market value.The definition of marketmarket rent when performing the income
value, according to the 10th edition of Theapproach to value.The three reasons contract
Appraisal of Real Estate published in 1992 by therent should not be used in valuation are: it may
Appraisal Institute, is: market value is the mostinclude compensation for participation in the
probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, orprogram and may not be equal to market rent,
in terms equivalent to cash, or in other preciselycurrent plans are to eliminate the program and, it
revealed terms for which the specified propertyis inconsistent with national public policy Another
rights should sell after reasonable exposure in afactor to consider when performing the income
competitive market under all conditions requisiteapproach is the market occupancy. Since tenants
to a fair sale, with the buyer and seller eachat the subsidized housing projects do not pay
acting prudently, knowledgeably, and fortheir rent or pay very minimal rent, the
self-interest, and assuming that neither is underoccupancy tends to be at above-market level.
undue duress.The term which requires furtherConsider the following tables which list the
review in the above definition is "knowledgeably."occupancy rates for both market rent projects
Is the purchaser knowledgeable regarding theand subsidized rent projects:Sales Comparison
effort required to comply with subsidized housingApproach:The sales comparison approach analysis
program requirements and tenants? Does hefurther demonstrates the typical market values in
consider the effort to be rent for real estate orthis submarket. We have utilized information on
compensation for services? Does the purchasercomparable sales both from our internal database
of an LIHTC project understand that maximumand from the Harris County Appraisal District
rents are now established for at least 15 yearsdatabase. Most sales within the submarket are
based on deed restrictions? (LIHTC deedlisted:Valuation of LIHTC ProjectsThe key
restrictions are now required for 30 years indifference between Low Income Housing Tax
Texas and most other states.)Fee simple estateCredit project (LIHTC) and a market rent project
is defined in the third edition of the Dictionary ofis that the LIHTC project has deed restrictions
Real Estate Appraisal published by the Appraisalwhich limit the maximum rent that can be
Institute as: absolute ownership unencumbered bycharged. The restrictions also limit the maximum
any other interest or estate, subject only to theincome of the residents. The Oregon Supreme
limitations imposed by the governmental powersCourt ruled that the assessed value for LIHTC
of taxation, eminent domain, police power andprojects should be less than the assessed value
escheat.The practice in Texas is to base thefor market rent projects since the rent at LIHTC
assessed value on the value of the fee simpleprojects is less than market rent, and the rents
estate as opposed to the leased fee estate. Thisrestrict the market. In Texas and most other
analysis is based on valuation of the fee simplestates, the LIHTC project is limited by a 30-year
estate instead of the leased fee estate.Thedeed restriction which runs with the land. In other
definition of leased fee estate in the third editionwords, it may not be revoked unilaterally by the
of the Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal is: anproperty owner even if the property is sold or
ownership interest held by a landlord with theforeclosed. In exchange for these onerous
rights of use and occupancy conveyed by leaserestrictions, the LIHTC property owner receives a
to others. The rights of the lessor (the leased feegenerous tax credit allowance from the U.S.
owner) and the lessee are specified by contractgovernment. Developers typically sell the tax
terms contained within the lease.The primarycredits for approximately 45 percent to 60
difference between the fee simple estate and thepercent of the project development cost.The
leased fee estate is that the tenant and landlordprimary difference between LIHTC projects and
are each bound by commitments to pay rent andmarket rent projects is the rental rate. Operating
allow use of the property for a term. Theexpenses will be similar in either case, but the
contract rent agreed to between landlord andLIHTC project will likely have higher occupancy
tenant may or may not be equal to market rent.due to its below-market rents. Section (b) of the
For example, if a landlord entered into a 30-yeardefinition of market rent in the Texas Property
lease for rent of $5 per square foot 15 years agoTax Code is as follows: both the seller and the
(when market rent was $5 per square foot) andpurchaser know of all the uses and purposes to
the current market rent is $10 per square foot,which the property is adapted and for which it is
the tenant has a substantial advantage. Thecapable of being used and of the enforceable
tenant has a leasehold estate which may or mayrestrictions on its use.The LIHTC projects are
not have value depending on the term of thelocated in targeted areas established by the
lease, the contract rent and market rent.Thefederal government which have below-average
Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal definesincome levels.Income Approach:The following are
leasehold estate as the interest held by the lesseethree income analyses of hypothetical 200-unit
(the tenant or renter) through a lease conveyingapartment complexes which each has 160,000 net
the rights of use and occupancy for a statedrentable square feet. Contract rent is estimated
term under certain conditions.Conversely, if theto be $0.62 per square foot at the LIHTC project
tenant agreed to a rental rate of $15 per squarebased on what is typical in the Houston area. (Our
foot in a strong market 10 years ago, and isfirm prepares approximately 20 market studies
committed to pay that rent for another 10 years,for LIHTC projects each year.) Market rent at
there is a substantial advantage to the landlord,new complexes in the Houston area is typically
and the tenant has a leasehold estate with a$0.80 to $1.10 per square foot per month. For the
negative value. Practice in Texas is to establishpurposes of this analysis, market rent for new
the assessed value based on the fee simplecomplexes is estimated to be $0.85 per square
estate instead of the leased fee estate.foot. Market occupancy is estimated to be 96
Therefore, the relevant criteria for determiningpercent for the LIHTC project due to the
market value includes market rent, marketbelow-market rents and 92 percent for the
expenses, market occupancy and market derivedmarket project. Operating expenses may be
capitalization rates. If a taxpayer made a poorslightly higher at the LIHTC project to account for
business decision 10 years ago and hasaccounting and communication with government
substantially below-market rent, it is inequitable foragencies because of the LIHTC requirements, but
the taxing entities to reduce their ad valorem taxthis amount is expected to be offset by the
due to the bad business decision of the propertylower ad valorem taxes. The analysis shows three
owner. Conversely, if a property owner made aincome approaches. In addition to the LIHTC and
fortuitous or wise business decision and enteredupscale market rent projects, a mid-range project
into an above-market lease, it is not appropriatewith rental rates roughly between the others is
to collect an above-average level of ad valoremincluded for comparison purposes. A 10 percent
tax from him because of his luck orcapitalization rate for the LIHTC project has been
prudence.Market rent is defined by the thirdincluded based on its below-market rents, which
edition of the Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisalappear to make the income stream more stable.
as: the rental income that a property would mostAn 11 percent capitalization rate is used for the
probably command in the open market; indicatedmid-range project since its rental rates would be
by current rents paid and asked for comparablefar above market for the area. The capitalization
space as of the date of appraisal.Market rent israte for the upscale market rent project is 9.5
the compensation paid for the use of the realpercent based on data in our files.It appears clear
estate. It should not include compensation paid forthat using market rent in the valuation of an
factors other than the use of the real estateLIHTC project would produce an appropriate
such as additional services which are not typicallyresult. Further, it appears the capitalization rate
provided.The next step in this process is toused in valuation of the LIHTC project using
analyze valuation of properties which participate incontract rents would overstate the values based
subsidized programs which receive above-marketon comparable sales. While investors would
rental rates. The final section will address valuationappreciate the stable income stream due to the
of projects in the LIHTC program.Valuation ofbelow-market rents, few investors would want to
Subsidized HousingThis analysis will consider bothpay $25,000 per unit for an apartment complex in
the income and the sales comparison approachesan area where most complexes sell for $5,000 to
to value. The cost approach is not utilized since it$15,000 per unit.Valuations of real property with
would provide similar results after calculatingabove- and below-market rental rates offer
external obsolescence due to differences in rentalchallenges to property owners and assessment
rates.Income Approach:Apartment owners whoofficers. There will likely be legitimate differences
participate in subsidized housing programs may orof opinion for the foreseeable future. Using the
may not receive above-market rental rates. Forsales comparison and income approaches to value
many years, HUD offered above-market rentalindicates a wide range of value. Thoughtful
rates as an inducement to property owners toconsideration and negotiation will be required to
participate in the program. There are two reasonsform a consensus on these issues.Pat O'Connor,
for HUD paying an above-market rental rate:MAI is president of O'Connor & Associates,
to compensate for the inconvenience of dealing130-person firm in business since 1974. O'Connor
with a bureaucratic government program which& Associates is the largest tax consultant in
mandates detailed inspections not typicallyTexas, handled more than 43,000 administrative
required in the private market; andappeals in 100 counties in 2005 and is currently
to compensate for working with residents whocoordinating over 2,000 judicial appeals. O'Connor
tend to be at the lowest socioeconomic level in& Associates also provides real estate appraisal,
our society.It has not been unusual for HUD tocost segregation and market research services.