Does the First Amendment Always Protect US Media

The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, aslaw?Several critical court cases have been
interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court, provideslandmarks in establishing the rights of the press to
the strongest guarantee of free speech in thepursue information and to publish government
world. Unlike people in many other countries,documents or derogatory information about public
Americans are free to criticize each other andfigures. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the
government officials in language both fair and foul,media should have some First Amendment
to engage in racist or other hateful speech, andprotection from the laws of libel for fear that
to use expletives and other bad language in public.lawsuits and possible monetary damages might
In some states, like California, they may evendisincline media owners from fully reporting on
exercise their right to free speech on otherpublic matters. In order for a public figure to win a
people's private property. Americans are verydefamation case against a media defendant, the
proud (some foreigners would say inordinately) ofplaintiff must show "actual malice," which the
their right to free speech; most of them feel thatcourts have defined as knowledge that the
it encourages a strong free press which regularlypublished statement was false or as "reckless
cleanses corruption out of American governmentdisregard of whether it was false or not".In our
(e.g., Watergate) and thus ensures its uniquetime, American free speech law has become an
stability.By the early years of the republic whenissue of international appeal since the Internet
the U.S. system of checks and balances wasrose as another main medium of communication.
devised, a daring journalistic community hadProbably, this is because many banned groups can
already become established. A bold and scrappytake advantage of Internet service providers
press was an influential force in denouncing thebased in the United States to send their
rule of an English King and leading Colonial Americamessages around the world, even where such
into its revolution against the British Empire. Withspeech is banned. U.S. courts will not enforce
journalistic freedom protected in the 1791 Bill offoreign judgments contrary to domestic public
Rights, the press became an assertive forcepolicy, including the liberal U.S. policy on free
during the first decades of nationhood. The U.S.speech. As for the U.S. perspective, many
media today is frequently known as the FourthAmericans dislike attempts by common law
Estate, an appellation that suggests the pressjurisdictions to extend their personal jurisdiction to
shares equal stature with the three branches ofAmerican defendants whose alleged defamatory
government created by the Constitution. Butspeech acts occurred over the Internet and were
although the press was not established as annot targeted towards those jurisdictions. If the
institution by the U.S. constitution, today manyFirst Amendment cannot protect them, what else
citizens believe that it constitutes a branch of U.S.can? Is diplomacy a solution? The fact remains
government. Numerous debates still rise regardingthat political and social scientists seem to have set
press's freedom to act as a watchdog of theoff in unknown waters.
American government. Is it protected by